During the quarter, Cablevision added 3,000 basic customers, compared to a basic sub. count gain of only 1,000 during Q4 07 and a loss of 17,000 customers during Q3 07. By quarter's end, Cablevision served 3.125 million core video customers, reflecting a 66.7% penetration of homes passed rate, the highest in the cable industry.

Cablevision also lays claim to the highest broadband and telephony penetration rates in the industry. (Download our spreadsheet for more detailed data on Cablevision.)

First, global entertainment, TV, publishing and now Internet giant News Corp. issued its fiscal Q3 08 results yesterday (PDF), showing strong performance, as usual, in its cable network division. (For more detailed News Corp. financial data download our spreadsheet.)

Although Insight Communications is a tiny cable company in comparison to giants Comcast and Time Warner, Willner is an industry pioneer who garners a lot of respect, having twice been Chairman of NCTA, the industry's trade association. Insight just finished unwinding a partnership with Comcast, Insight Midwest, which left the company with around 700,000 basic customers in Indiana, Kentucky and Ohio.

Not only is Willner blogging, but he also claims to get most of his news from blogs these days. In today's post he says he reads Broadband Reports, an online community that I guess is technically a blog, before he even reads the New York Times. Willner's goal is to suss out customer service problems before they hit the mainstream media and to identify potential service improvements.

We institutionalized monitoring the blogs and now regularly reach out to customers who post if we think we can help them with their issue. Indeed, we often discuss service changes and improvements that were thought of simply by reading blogs.

It's really no surprise that despite not winning spectrum, they continue to try to change the rules and further their own business interests through the regulatory process. We expect to file at the Federal Communications Commission within the next several days on this matter.

At the end of the quarter the telcos served a combined total of 5.7 million video customers (either through fiber-based service such as AT&T's Uverse or Verizon's FiOS or through DBS partnerships), 70% more than they served at the end of Q1 07.

The U.S. cable industry has been behind this new venture for a while and is backing it up with a lot of bucks -- $1.05 billion from Comcast, $550 million from Time Warner and $100 million from Brighthouse Networks. WiMax proponent Intel is putting in another $1 billion and, very interestingly, Google is slugging in $500 million of its cash. At one point, Best Buy was a party to the venture, until the negotiations among the mighty communications titans got too complex. The WSJ says that the venture is worth $12 billion altogether.

Google News is tracking 2,000 stories about the high-profile tent-folding and that, presumably, doesn't even include the thousands of bloggers who felt obligated to cover this (fundamentally predictable -- more on that below) development. Scott sums it up: "So while there's more content on the web, there may be less news."

First, the RIAA seems to be wavering in its traditional opposition to network neutrality regulations. Even though the record industry still doesn't like net neutrality regulations, Bainwol seemed to leave open the idea that if ISPs won't do something about music piracy, the RIAA might switch sides.

We continue to believe, at least right now, [italics added] that a marketplace solution with the ISPs to the piracy problem is viable, and certainly such a solution could be devised and implemented far more quickly than a regulatory proceeding. As the numbers tell you, however, the state of our industry requires action. If we cannot resolve this problem quickly in the private sector, regulation may be a necessary alternative.

On Friday, Google urged the FCC to block Verizon Wireless' $4.7 bil. successful bid for the C Block band of spectrum in the recently completed 700 MHz auction unless Verizon is forced to agree that open access rules apply to handsets it provides its own customers. Specifically, Google claims that Verizon Wireless has no intention of abiding by the open access rules governing the C block spectrum for devices it gives to its own customers and that the FCC should condition Verizon's grant upon a clear commitment that Verizon will not exclude these handsets from the requirement.

In a petition filed at the Commission (PDF) -- technically a petition to deny Verizon Wireless' winning bid for the spectrum -- Google said

Verizon has taken the public position that it may exclude its handsets from the open access condition. Verizon believes it may force customers who want to access the open platform using a device not purchased from Verizon to go through “Door No. 1,” while allowing customers who obtain their device from Verizon access through “Door No. 2.” As Google previously made clear, Verizon’s position would completely reverse the meaning of the rule such that the open access condition would apply to none of Verizon’s customers, and thereby render the condition a nullity. Because this “two-door” position espoused by Verizon is contrary to the plain meaning of the rule, as well as the Commission’s public interest findings and policy objectives set forth in the 700 MHz Second R&O, it must be rejected.

But BPL, a kludgy technology aimed at squeezing communications-strength capacity out of power lines, is almost DOA in the USA. First, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia last week rapped the FCC on the knuckles for failing to take a look at studies that deal with BPL's propensity for interference as it rushed to adopt new rules promoting the competitive alternative.

The cable operator got a lot of kudos for using this cutting-edge microblogging platform to search for customer complaints, although some folks thought that Arrington only got the company's attention because...he's Arrington. But Frank Eliason, the Comcast employee who under the name Comcastcares scans Twitter for complaints (and who posted a comment on my blog entry about the incident) told Taylor that he helps out any customer in distress.

At the time of the deal, some folks speculated that AOL was paying an unheard-of 160 times cash flow for the presumably attractive but still tiny social networking service. Bebo reportedly generated only $20 million in revenue and $5 million in cash flow during 2007, although with a rumored $15 billion valuation on Facebook, $850 million might seem reasonable.